In a buyer's market, many buyers and their agents use a blanket low-offer strategy regardless of a home's actual value — and it's costing them. Not every home in London, Ontario is overpriced. Some are genuinely well-priced, upgraded, and sitting on the market simply because buyers are comparing them to inferior sales from months earlier rather than properly reading the current comparable data. A real example: a buyer who refused to pay $650,000 for a superior townhouse ended up paying $595,000 two weeks later for an older, lesser unit with $285 higher monthly condo fees. The market offers real opportunity right now — but only to buyers who can tell the difference between an overpriced home and one that's genuinely worth what it's asking. Ty Lacroix, Broker at The Envelope Real Estate Group, has spent 24 years helping London buyers find that difference before it costs them.
Not all homes in London, Ontario are overpriced. Yes, we're in a buyer's market — but that doesn't mean every seller will or should reduce their price, and treating the market as if they all should is costing buyers real money.
Some sellers have genuinely overpriced their homes. That's true. But comparing those listings to ones that are priced correctly, and applying the same low-offer logic to both, is what economists might call throwing the baby out with the bathwater — and it's distorting buyer decision-making in a way that consistently leads to worse outcomes for buyers themselves.
Here's a concrete example.
A Tale of Two Units
A townhouse condo is listed for sale at $650,000. It's the only available unit in its enclave. Five months earlier, one sold in the same complex for $565,000.
The immediate reaction from most buyers and their agents is that the $650,000 unit is overpriced.
Before accepting that conclusion, I looked at what the $565,000 sale actually was:
The seller was in financial difficulty and needed to sell quickly or risk losing the property to the mortgage holder. The listing had nine photos, no video, and no floor plans. No status certificate was provided — the buyer was responsible for ordering one themselves. It had been listed at $639,000 originally, cancelled, reduced, and expired three times before finally selling. Everything inside was original from the builder with no upgrades. The listing agent was based in the GTA, and the only way to book a showing was through a brokerage switchboard — usually an answering service — then waiting hours for a callback, sometimes days by email. The unit was vacant and dusty, with a stale odour. The rugs were slightly soiled and the walls needed paint.
Now the $650,000 unit:
Upgraded throughout — high-quality flooring, lighting, window coverings, and appliances, professionally decorated. One additional bathroom. A backyard view of green space rather than a six-foot concrete wall.
Other units that sold in that enclave through 2024 ranged from $619,000 to $640,000. The $650,000 unit, with its extra bathroom and full upgrades, was priced at a premium over that range — but a defensible one when the comparables were read properly.
What Actually Happened
A buyer viewed the $650,000 unit, appreciated it, but concluded it was overpriced because a unit there had sold five months earlier for $565,000. An offer of $575,000 was made and refused — the seller and their agent considered it insulting given the unit's condition and upgrades. A verbal counter of $589,000 was declined.
Two weeks later, that same buyer purchased a unit in a different part of London for $595,000. It was older, in lesser condition, and carried monthly condo fees $285 higher than the unit they'd walked away from.
Who came out ahead?
The buyer paid more per month, got less quality, and walked away from a genuinely superior asset because they applied a blanket low-offer strategy without reading what actually drove the earlier $565,000 sale. The "overpriced" unit wasn't overpriced. It was correctly priced for what it was — and the buyer who understood that would have gotten the better home at a comparable net cost.
What This Means Right Now
The current London market is a genuine opportunity for buyers. There is real softening, and there are homes that are genuinely overpriced. Those sellers, if they're serious about selling, will eventually have to adjust.
But there are also sellers whose homes are priced accurately, who are not in a hurry, and who have no reason to negotiate below market value just because the broader market has softened. Those sellers will wait for the buyer who does their homework. And they'll find that buyer — while the buyers playing a blanket low-offer game miss the value that was right in front of them.
I see well-priced homes and condos sitting on the market regularly, waiting for the buyer with enough market knowledge to recognize value when it's there. If you want to be that buyer — the one who identifies real opportunity instead of chasing inferior alternatives at a comparable price — that's exactly the kind of guidance worth having before you write your next offer.
Oh, by the way, I sold that $650,000 unit for $649,000!
Want to know the difference between a home that's overpriced and one that's genuinely worth it? Reach out for a private conversation — no pressure, no pitch.
